Adil Baguirov Wedding
نويسندهي پانتركيست مينويسد: «طبري مي گويد: "منوچهر در آذربايجان با تركان جنگيد ... كيخسرو و فرزندان او در آذربايجان با تركان جنگيدند .
Nizami naturally has got to use two names, Shirin and Afak, two Participate in off the comparison and just one without the other could be significantly less reasonable and make a lot less sense. Then it would be: “My Kipchak idol! … Died, like Shirin, you too, my horizon”. Although we settle for Mr. Doostzadeh’s always anti-Turkic Model that Kipchak usually means not the Turkic country, but stunning lover or Another incorrect version, it might render The entire verse less reasonable, as Nizami could well be referring to some unnamed “phantom”.
برنده ره بیابان در بیابان به کوهستان ارمن شد شتابان که آن خوبان چو انبوه آمدندی به تابستان در آن کوه آمدندی چو شاپور آمد آنجا سبزه نو بود ریاحین را شقایق پیش رو بود گرفته سنگهای لاجوردی ز کسوتهای گل سرخی و زردی
I suggested the exact same. Even Britannica in the posting about Nizami will not mention that he was a Persian poet, but suggests:
چو ترکان گشته سوی کوچ محتاج به ترکی داده رختم را به تارج اگر شد ترکم از خرگه نهانی خدایا ترک زادم را تو دانی
Although I am at it, let me just add A different place or two about among the other false statements of Mr. Baguirov. Mr Baguirov mentioned: Obviously The very fact there are these kinds of terrific Turkic eposes as Dede Korkut and Oghuz Nameh, which might be oral stories from a minimum of 1300 in the past, and oldest manuscript of which was prepared in 1053. And this claim is incredibly massive lie. There may be only two manuscripts of dede Korkut work (Evaluate it to convey Shahnameh with one thousand+ manuscripts). Dede-Qorqod has about 150 Persian words and three hundred Arabic phrases. It talks about Iranians (tats) with beards (Oghuz Turks at that time had been mostly mongloid like Turkomens) performing Azzan even though Iranians weren't Islamified nonetheless 1300 years in the past.
I imagine that referring to Armenian resources to establish that all Azerbaijani scientists are falsifiers will not be a good idea. For starters, since the resource has an evident bias. Secondly, when click here for info you check out your source, the writer does a similar falsifications he accuses other of accomplishing. See an example:
Doostzadeh and Other people do too). So Mr. Kapustin wrote within an period, when pressure of not the Communist bash, but dollars from wealthy and effective Armenian diaspora was widespread, especially as the latter fully dominated M.Gorbachev’s govt answerable for economic system, sciences and culture.
On this page[forty] They may be referred to as oriental eyes. Any celebration Nizami Ganjavi like other Persian poets employed the phrase almond (which could also occur in numerous shapes and sizes dependant upon regional variations) to eyes .
The condition once more may be the USSR historiography which isn't trusted In regards to ethnic troubles. Certainly most of the exact USSR Students also tried to demonstrate Nizami Ganjavi as anti-Islam. Plus some Students have taken the above couplets to mean that Shirvanshah weren't likely to be stingy, like Mahmud of Ghazna was to Ferdowsi. Other scholars have simply taken it really virtually with no attachments.
It talks about Iranians (tats) with beards (Oghuz Turks At the moment were mostly mongloid like Turkomens) undertaking Azzan when Iranians were not Islamified still 1300 a long time back. It talks in regards to the land of Rum, while at that time it was not even for the arms of Muslims! Dede Korkut (the lifestyle of Oghuz Turks) is completely with the Oghuz tradition. [sixteen]. In fact to point out that is not as outdated as Mr. Baguirov along with other extremely-nationalists claim, the term "istanbul" is located in this e-book. And I quotation[seventeen]: The Full Report retailers set out on their lengthy journey and traveled steadily For several days and evenings. They arrived finally to town of
forty nine, No. one, 1986), we read through:The Oghuz tribes(Azarbaijani Turkic speakers converse Oghuz language and therefore are deemed Oghuz through the nationalists) which fashioned the basis with the Saljuq energy, and also to a single which the Seljuqs belonged ended up culturally backward, and contrary towards the impression Highly developed by some Students(He mentions a pan-turkic scholar with the identify of F.(Fuwwad?) Koprulu), didn't posses a created language. Thus the Seljuqs did not, or fairly couldn't consider measures towards the propagating the Turkish language, within a composed sort, a lot less the patronage of Turkish letters.
36) Mr. Baguirov repeats the nonsense that Nizami’s father was a Turk but without a doubt if which was the situation, then all fashionable Western Students would have mentioned it plus they didn’t it. So indeed seeking to repeat something one thousand occasions would not ensure it is true.
And Again, Mongols weren't even acknowledged to Nizami. As was not Kor-oglu, who was at best a seventeenth century phenomenon. In the meantime, Nizami in his five epic poems had to jot down about what was common and needed to the patrons – and even Turkic rulers preferred smth about possibly Persian or Arabic rulers. What Nizami wrote in his Divan we gained’t know obviously – ninety% of it's missing.
Adil Baguirov Wedding